Quantcast
Register Help
topbanner
  
spacer
Starbucks, Jamba sour on corn syrup

Are latest chains to switch over to sugar


By LISA  JENNINGS



EmailPrint

SEATTLE (June  22, 2009 ) —Menu revamps at both coffeehouse giant Starbucks Corp. and smoothie leader Jamba Juice earlier this month have raised the stakes in the growing controversy over high-fructose corn syrup as a ubiquitous ingredient in American foodservice.

Starbucks said it will roll out a line of new baked goods without high-fructose corn syrup, starting June 30.

Beginning June 30, Starbucks said it would unveil a line of new baked goods made without what it called “unnecessary stuff,” including artificial flavors, colors, and, most significantly, high-fructose corn syrup, or HFCS, which the chain said it has removed from the menu across the board.

Earlier this month, Emeryville, Calif.-based Jamba Juice also introduced a new food menu with sandwiches, salads, flatbreads and new Fruit Tea blends—all of which are also being promoted as free of HFCS and artificial flavors or preservatives. Now in 222 California locations, the menu is expected to be available throughout the 732-unit chain within a year, officials said.

A sweetener commonly used in place of sugar, HFCS has been assailed by some as a contributor to the nation’s growing problem with obesity and heart disease. A study published in The Journal of Clinical Investigation in May indicated that fructose-sweetened beverages led to higher levels of LDL, or “bad” cholesterol.

However, the American Medical Association maintains that HFCS has the same caloric content as sugar and, once absorbed in the bloodstream, the sweeteners are undistinguishable. Both will contribute to obesity if too much is consumed, according to the AMA, and many dietitians remain unconvinced that favoring sugar over HFCS is justified.

Still, the anti-HFCS sentiment among consumers is growing and some operators are responding.

The 212-unit Jason’s Deli chain, based in Beaumont, Texas, last year eliminated HFCS from its food menu. Officials with the 85-unit Which Wich chain, based in Dallas, say they are also moving in that direction.

Other restaurant operators are promoting “cane-sugar sweetened” products to appeal to HFCS-avoiding clientele.

When Taco Bell introduced its new Frutista Freeze beverages last year, the drinks were described as “sweetened with sucrose,” as opposed to HFCS.

Starbucks’ secondary brand, Seattle’s Best Coffee, also offers a line of Red Cane Kolas sweetened with pure cane sugar.

Starbucks, however, with its more than 7,000 units in the United States, is the largest chain to date to take a no-HFCS stand.

Officials at both Starbucks and Jamba Juice said their decisions to eliminate HFCS from menu items came in response to consumer demand. The moves, however, also offer the brands a point of differentiation at a time when competition for the consumers’ dollar is particularly tight.

While HFCS can be found in a range of products, from ketchup to bread, the sweetener is commonly used in sodas made in the United States, in part because it historically has cost less than cane or beet sugars and beverage makers favor its shelf stability and pourability, according to the Coke website.

However, some beverage companies appear to be responding to consumer demand for sugar-sweetened drinks.

PepsiCo earlier this year introduced a new “Pepsi Natural” in certain markets, sweetened with a blend of cane and beet sugars. The beverage maker also introduced for a limited time this spring a product called “Pepsi Throwback” and “Mountain Dew Throwback,” also cane and beet sugar-sweetened.

However, Nicole Bradley, a Pepsi spokeswoman, said the company has no current plans to bring HFCS-free products to Pepsi’s restaurant partners.

1 | 2

Previous Articles:
No big gains in the war on obesity, studies find
Burgerville tests nutrition data on receipts
Salt shakeout: Denny’s, CSPI in sodium suit
 
Industry criticizes report’s suggestion that fast-food bans will curb obesity
Kids weigh in on what they like to eat
Chains urge Congress to broaden labeling bill